Joseph Parker - Printable Version +- NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz) +-- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Joseph Parker (/showthread.php?tid=52) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Joseph Parker - Kiwi - 05-29-2016 I sure don't. Oops - my bad. Wrong forum. RE: Joseph Parker - shamrock - 05-29-2016 Stupid question I have already answered. RE: Joseph Parker - diehard - 05-29-2016 No you didn't Sham. Yes or No. Do you want Parker to lose against Haumono like Nigs does? RE: Joseph Parker - shamrock - 05-29-2016 Die yr question should should read Do I think Jo will lose against Solomon.. The answer is NO! How ever I'm thinking he will lose to the top ten I posted awhile ago. He will beat Solomon Haumono. .. RE: Joseph Parker - diehard - 05-29-2016 So you won't answer the question of whether you want Parker to lose against Haumono. That tells me you, like Nigs, want Parker to lose. No need to change my question. You gave me your answer. You WANT Parker to lose against Haumono. At least Nigs can admit it! Come on, Sham. Can't you be honest? No one will think bad about you. RE: Joseph Parker - shamrock - 05-29-2016 Why would I want him to lose to Haumono when the idea is inconceivable to me die? Please answer! Some people are fanboys of the duco express because there's gain in it to be seen as such. This incidently could influence your intentions and how you operate. Some days you seem inconsistent and that question looms. Bob Jones is not bothered by it nor nigs by the look of it. Jo Parker has got a loss coming if they push him on the same path. And Lonergan better be careful he doesn't get what he wishes for. Yes I do agree with nigs and hope a wheel will fall of sooner or later. Not against Haumono and I consider nigs wasn't targeting this coming fight either. He has too much pragmatism to to think that way I think. RE: Joseph Parker - diehard - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 04:27 PM)shamrock Wrote: Why would I want him to lose to Haumono when the idea is inconceivable to me die? Please answer!Why would you want Haumono to lose? To shut up Duco and Lonergan, which is what Nigs said. I understand the reasoning, that Lonergan runs his mouth so much that if Parker lost, he'd shut up. Maybe. But I think it would be worse, with the excuses and whoever he fought in the future. Truth is, Lonergan wasn't sure Parker could beat Takam, and said he was relieved when it was over. KB said it was a pick'em fight. 50/50 fight. I guess what I'm saying is that we should be shooting the Messenger, not the fighter. He hasn't done any boasting, other than to say that Takam, with his age and last chance saloon, he's the one that should be nervous, not (him)Parker. I hate Lonergan's presence as much as most others, but please don't let that carry over to Parker. RE: Joseph Parker - cranky - 05-30-2016 Parker v Haye ? http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12040/10296062/david-haye-and-joseph-parker-would-produce-an-explosive-fight-with-plenty-at-stake RE: Joseph Parker - Boxingfan25 - 05-30-2016 Wouldn't put JP anywhere near Haye YET. RE: Joseph Parker - diehard - 05-30-2016 Nope. I wouldn't either. |