Joseph Parker - Printable Version +- NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz) +-- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Joseph Parker (/showthread.php?tid=52) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Joseph Parker - diehard - 05-22-2016 Me too. Which is why going to the UK on the AJ undercard is a good deal. Take it Team Parker. No, it was good to face such a tough opponent in Joe's back yard. Here's what Joe had to say about Takam and the fight: http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-sports/80244701/buoyant-joseph-parker-warns-ibf-world-champion-anthony-joshua-this-is-my-time RE: Joseph Parker - Msreef - 05-22-2016 (05-22-2016, 07:05 PM)diehard Wrote: Me too. Which is why going to the UK on the AJ undercard is a good deal. Take it Team Parker. No, it was good to face such a tough opponent in Joe's back yard. Here's what Joe had to say about Takam and the fight: +1 If Jo does eventually fight Joshua it will definitely be in the UK. What better prep than to fight another guy there beforehand. RE: Joseph Parker - Msreef - 05-22-2016 David Haye discusses Parker vs Takam https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oD7r54YMj64 Skip to 5:10 RE: Joseph Parker - diehard - 05-22-2016 Here's the compu-punch stat as well as JP talking about being hit. As I said earlier, it was close: http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-sports/80252098/joseph-parker-proves-he-has-a-chin-to-make-kevin-barry-grin RE: Joseph Parker - james5000 - 05-22-2016 I thought it was clear Parker outworked Takam, Takam never fought hard for 1 whole round. He would sit there for 2 minutes doing sweet fuck all, then try to steal the round in the last minute. Heaps of people think Takam threw more punches? Must have been the beers I'm guessing I kind of feel like Joe was too excited and nervous and he wasted energy in the changing room because tbh the first 4 rounds were low out put and he was truly gassed in the 5th. Parker won this fight 116-112 imo, it was not flawless and a harder working Takam could have pinched it but he might have got ktfo as well. Is Parkers gas tank much better than AJ's, the jury's still out on that one I think but I do think Parker has a better chin. RE: Joseph Parker - james5000 - 05-22-2016 I also thought Joe's intro was awesome great entrance lol RE: Joseph Parker - shamrock - 05-22-2016 Get a napkin and wipe yr chin James. . Jo did well but not flawless as you jack it up. There were quite a few rounds when Takam was busier, this agreed amongst experienced boxing people who don't drink and lends to some believing he was ripped off..my friends andi I thought a clear win to Joe but more like 15.13 not 16.12 as a couple of judges had it. It's premature to say Jo has a better chin than AJ, I'd venture to say Dyllian Wyte might have a bit more snap in his shots than Carlos Takam. In saying all that Joseph Parker has become an exciting prospect in virtually one fight. The future now looks filled with surprises and with KB talking 1-2 fights before taking on AJ seemslike great common sense RE: Joseph Parker - james5000 - 05-22-2016 I said not flawless? Takam hit Joe with a lot of good shots, it wasn't the punches that were making him look a bit wobbly though it was his gas tank. AJ has been hit with 1 good shot (from a massive puncher tbf) when he was fresh as a daisy and he was rocked to his core. AJ doesn't have a bad chin but Joe's is better. and Sham do you think its fair to say Takam didn't outwork Joe? If your giving Takam rounds it wasn't on a work rate basis? RE: Joseph Parker - The Fly - 05-22-2016 I've watched it again. There were a few rounds that could have gone either way. My end score was 6 rounds each. 10-9 Takam. Close but the cleaner shots landed by Takam. Some solid lefts. 10-9 Parker. Parker was busier but a lot was not landing clean. 10-9 Parker. Clear round for Parker on activity alone. Takam coming on towards the end of the round. 10-9 Parker. Very close. Takam may have landed the better shots. Parker already starting to go backwards and up against the ropes. 10-9 Takam. Parker running backwards at times. 10-9 Takam. Close. First minute Joe was going back throwing but not really landing. 2nd minute was Parker. 3rd minute was all Takam. 10-9 Parker. Activity alone. 10-9 Takam. Excellent round. Takam won the 1st minute. Parker got the better of the exchanges in the 2nd minute. Takam working hard until the bell with Parkers back against the ropes. 10-9 Takam. Neither guy doing anything noteworthy early. Parker using the jab but nothing really landing. Cleaner shots landed by Takam over the last minute. 10-9 Parker. It looked like Takam took a breather. No one really did much but Parker was more active. 10-9 Parker. Close. Takam could have stolen it over the last minute. 10-9 Takam. A good close round. Every time Takam landed Joe tried to fight back but the cleaner shots were landed by Takam. RE: Joseph Parker - mippy - 05-22-2016 Apparently the IBF is nominating the fight as the IBF heavyweight fight of the year |