Joseph Parker - Printable Version +- NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz) +-- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Joseph Parker (/showthread.php?tid=52) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Joseph Parker - diehard - 02-19-2016 Takam was going to be a possibility in July as an eliminator, with a step up top 25 fighter in April. I think Stu has his opponent in April, just waiting for Duco to announce it. No way Takam in April in CC. As I said before, no way Martin, or any top ten fighter fights Parker in NZ. Too expensive. RE: Joseph Parker - Infern0 - 02-19-2016 Personally I do feel parker is overrated, he's a good prospect but I don't feel he's exceptional in any way. The thing is most of the parker fans are just that, Parker fans. Not boxing fans. A good friend of mine told me parker was the best prospect since Tyson. And he didn't even know that klitscho and fury were fighting, or who fury was. The last fight he watched before a Parker fight was probably sbw. But we've had to live through this with Cameron, then the tua comeback. I was one of few who was saying if tua had anything left he'd blast a fighter as basic as Shane out early, then after he did all the former Cameron fans were saying tua would destroy David haye. If you ask one of these guys about parker vs Joshua they will say parker will ko him, them if you ask tactics, they don't have an answer basically they say that parker will ko him in a slugfest. So you are like "OK so he's going to stand at midrange and trade punches with probably the hardest puncher in the division" and they just look confused The thing is if parker loses these people won't watch anymore boxing, they are in it purely to support parker and for national pride, maybe its not a bad thing, but at some point because of them I'm going to clean up at the tab when Joe fights a world level opponent. RE: Joseph Parker - Justapakeha - 02-20-2016 Rewatching the Bergman fight, I found Joseph Parker's attacks uncreative and predictable. Ie left left right then the inside work. Hes definitely prone to being timed for a cracking counter something Bergman couldnt utilise. I do believe cerebral boxers like Jennings, Ortiz, Fury, would capitalise on this. South paws like Tarver, Martin are all wrong for him. Ortiz is a nightmare. would like to see some more awkwardness in Parker's game. His movements are a bit trite and foreseeable. He should trust his power, mix it up and fight the fighter not just stick to the game plan hes been given. Need to see him in a crisis to see if he's got a plan b. RE: Joseph Parker - Infern0 - 02-20-2016 (02-20-2016, 12:06 AM)Justapakeha Wrote: Rewatching the Bergman fight, I found Joseph Parker's attacks uncreative and predictable. Ie left left right then the inside work. Hes definitely prone to being timed for a cracking counter something Bergman couldnt utilise. I do believe cerebral boxers like Jennings, Ortiz, Fury, would capitalise on this. South paws like Tarver, Martin are all wrong for him. Ortiz is a nightmare. would like to see some more awkwardness in Parker's game. His movements are a bit trite and foreseeable. He should trust his power, mix it up and fight the fighter not just stick to the game plan hes been given. Need to see him in a crisis to see if he's got a plan b. Robotic was the word, pre-programmed and sent out by barry. When bergman made things a bit awkward the 1-2's weren't getting the job done, parker was looking at his corner in confusion. Bergman was a bit of a spoiler that's granted but it took way too long to get rid of him. There are certain opponents where it pays to be cautious, against Bergman parker could afford to, and needed to, step over his front foot and fire off combinations. RE: Joseph Parker - Justapakeha - 02-20-2016 The only top 25, expedient guys I see next for Parker would be Fedosov or Tarver (both above Parker in WBA) and visa versa he's a good scalp for those two, rankingwise - especially Fed. I'd be nervous if it was Tarver. Fedosov is winnable I guess. Ustinov in talks with Hughie, Hammer fighting march. Malik Scott's an outside chance I guess - he's travelled downunder before and probably fancies himself. Id back Parker against the chinny Scott and the technical challenge would be of value to Joe. Perez, Brezeale(risky) round out the rest of viable/availabe top 25 guys. Adamek gives Jo hell even now I reckon, though hes fighting Molina in april. RE: Joseph Parker - Justapakeha - 02-20-2016 (02-20-2016, 12:26 AM)Infern0 Wrote:(02-20-2016, 12:06 AM)Justapakeha Wrote: Rewatching the Bergman fight, I found Joseph Parker's attacks uncreative and predictable. Ie left left right then the inside work. Hes definitely prone to being timed for a cracking counter something Bergman couldnt utilise. I do believe cerebral boxers like Jennings, Ortiz, Fury, would capitalise on this. South paws like Tarver, Martin are all wrong for him. Ortiz is a nightmare. would like to see some more awkwardness in Parker's game. His movements are a bit trite and foreseeable. He should trust his power, mix it up and fight the fighter not just stick to the game plan hes been given. Need to see him in a crisis to see if he's got a plan b. Yep. Pre programming iis dangerous. I'm no boxer, but I gather a good balance of tactics and intuition is a must. Being flexible in fight is probably important in high calibre bouts, and as you say looking at Barry halfway through isnt a great sign. Maybe he does it because Barry' shouting at him and micromanaging him during the fight. Like being polite and showing 'yeah Im listening'. Hopefully he doesnt get into the habit of just putting combinations in because 'thats what they learnt' if its not working, hes the one in the ring who has to take the onus and be creative, not an obsequious naive kid RE: Joseph Parker - Infern0 - 02-20-2016 (02-20-2016, 01:02 AM)Justapakeha Wrote:(02-20-2016, 12:26 AM)Infern0 Wrote:(02-20-2016, 12:06 AM)Justapakeha Wrote: Rewatching the Bergman fight, I found Joseph Parker's attacks uncreative and predictable. Ie left left right then the inside work. Hes definitely prone to being timed for a cracking counter something Bergman couldnt utilise. I do believe cerebral boxers like Jennings, Ortiz, Fury, would capitalise on this. South paws like Tarver, Martin are all wrong for him. Ortiz is a nightmare. would like to see some more awkwardness in Parker's game. His movements are a bit trite and foreseeable. He should trust his power, mix it up and fight the fighter not just stick to the game plan hes been given. Need to see him in a crisis to see if he's got a plan b. Yeah, one of the things about Tyson Fury that makes him so effective is that he thinks on the fly and adapts to what's in front of him. Steve Cunningham was giving him all sorts of problems with movement and speed, so Fury simply switched up to use his size, leaned on him and fought dirty. he's not pretty but it is effective, and we saw in the Klitschko fight how a guy who is robotic and tries to fight a textbook perfect style came undone against unpredictability. I think joe is a natural fighter, Barry needs to let him get his hands dirty if need be RE: Joseph Parker - Justapakeha - 02-20-2016 (02-20-2016, 01:16 AM)Infern0 Wrote:Yeah, one reason Im not sure of the Parker/barry chemistry. As a ground roots teacher hes great im sure. but he seems to be pretty stubborn and pigheaded with his 'knows best' approach. Just not sure if the basics works later on when you come up against real livewires. I would love parker to get in with a John david Jackson type, where it seems a bit more a team environment as opposed to 'do as i say' approach. Barry comes off a bit obsessive and un open to his fighter's - who knows though(02-20-2016, 01:02 AM)Justapakeha Wrote:(02-20-2016, 12:26 AM)Infern0 Wrote:(02-20-2016, 12:06 AM)Justapakeha Wrote: Rewatching the Bergman fight, I found Joseph Parker's attacks uncreative and predictable. Ie left left right then the inside work. Hes definitely prone to being timed for a cracking counter something Bergman couldnt utilise. I do believe cerebral boxers like Jennings, Ortiz, Fury, would capitalise on this. South paws like Tarver, Martin are all wrong for him. Ortiz is a nightmare. would like to see some more awkwardness in Parker's game. His movements are a bit trite and foreseeable. He should trust his power, mix it up and fight the fighter not just stick to the game plan hes been given. Need to see him in a crisis to see if he's got a plan b. RE: Joseph Parker - Justapakeha - 02-20-2016 Would someone give Dean Lonergan a bell and find out Parker's next fight? RE: Joseph Parker - diehard - 02-20-2016 Well, that's the problem. Parker needs to learn the basics, especially against lefties. Which makes him robotic. He's still developing the fundamentals and learning his craft while being micro-managed by KB. If he uses his natural instincts, without the fundamentals, he won't go far. If he uses just the fundamentals and not his natural instincts, he's robotic, and like you say, will get countered. He needs to put it all together, and as KB says, he's still in his infancy. |