10-19-2017, 06:17 AM
(10-18-2017, 06:43 PM)craigyid14 Wrote: It probably would of been a good fight for Joshua 2 years ago, but what does it prove now? The guy looked lazy against Parker 18 months ago and since then has beaten 2 guys not in the top 100, team Parker might be happy fighting sub standard opponents for money (as is team Wilder), I just hoped for better from Joshua's mob. From Pulev to Takam, rubbish.
It's a mandatory, AJ and Hearn had no choice otherwise forfeit the belt. Get it out of the way and deal with either the WBA mandatory or a unification. Can't blame them for that surely.