01-19-2016, 06:52 PM
I'm confused. We say that Joe has fought no one, but say if he steps up against 5-10 opponents, he loses. We say that Joe doesn't deserve his ranking since he's fought no one, but give AJ a pass since he fought an unranked fighter (at the time) in Whyte. We complain that he fights fringe fighters, and it's boring. So which is it. Is he good enough to fight top fighters? Or should he fight guys he ko's in one because that's the best he can do?
I don't think Parker needs to beat everyone in the heavyweight division. Only guys in front of him that lead to an eliminator. At the moment, it's Takam. Parker can beat him. I personally think he can beat Fury and Martin. But Fury won't matter. He'll get KO'd by Klit, and Klit will then retire. He just doesn't want to fight anymore. Ortiz and Wilder will be tougher matches. But Parker will be a better fighter after he beats Takam.
I don't think Parker needs to beat everyone in the heavyweight division. Only guys in front of him that lead to an eliminator. At the moment, it's Takam. Parker can beat him. I personally think he can beat Fury and Martin. But Fury won't matter. He'll get KO'd by Klit, and Klit will then retire. He just doesn't want to fight anymore. Ortiz and Wilder will be tougher matches. But Parker will be a better fighter after he beats Takam.