02-04-2018, 07:45 PM
(02-04-2018, 12:34 PM)Boxingfan25 Wrote:(02-02-2018, 07:21 PM)Infern0 Wrote:(02-02-2018, 06:46 PM)Boxingfan25 Wrote:(02-02-2018, 06:02 PM)diehard Wrote: https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-sports/101132806/joseph-parker-v-anthony-joshua-fight-not-deemed-worthy-by-boxings-bible
Fair enough too. Gotta beat the Gypsy King First
No
Official Ring rules state that a vacant title can only be contested if #1 vs #2 fight
That's joshua #1 and wilder #2
Parker is #3 which is why the fight isn'
For that belt. On rare occasions #1 and #3 can fight for it, for instance klitschko v chagaev when vitali was #2 because thet would never fight each other
I’m well aware of how it works. I was simply meaning that Tyson is the best and neither guy is worthy unless they beat Tyson.
I disagree.
Fury will enter the bottom half of the top 10 if he wins upon hus return which is about right for me.
He's been out for over 2 years and has a ton of question marks.
He could prove he's still the best but its him with it to prove now, parker or joshua will be clear #1 whoever wins