+- NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz)
+-- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? (/showthread.php?tid=431)
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - Msreef - 11-14-2017
Higgins isn't going to get 40%, he's dreaming.
Parker should fight Browne, and then Whyte or the Bellew/Haye winner.. He really needs to improve his profile in the UK if he wants anything close to 40%.
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - Infern0 - 11-14-2017
This whole situation at heavyweight is a joke tbh belts dont mean anything anymore and we all know that.
We all know wlad was the man at heavyweight even when at that time you had chagaev, valuev, haye, povetkin, wilder all running round with a "belt" at some stage, nobody cared about it whatsoever.
We had no tyson fury and wilder didn't want to take any risks so #1 and #2 in the division faced off (klitschko joshua)
Thats all there is to it nobody cares about the bum ass belts these guys are carrying, you want to be the best stop trying to be donald trump, take reasonable money and go prove it.
Tired of tge yapping and no action on ALL sides, im starting to yearn for the days when klitschko used to shit guys like this up every few months.
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - diehard - 11-14-2017
So no belts given anymore?
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - mippy - 11-14-2017
40% is a good negotiating point, I'm sure they'll jump at 30. Wilder wants 50 and won't get it, so either they negotiate with one of the other champs or Joshua doesn't really want either fight.
I still think there's a very good chance of Joshua vs Parker in March.
Oh and Wilder won't fight White in March as an undercard to Wilder vs Joshua either.
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - mippy - 11-14-2017
(11-14-2017, 02:42 PM)Infern0 Wrote: This whole situation at heavyweight is a joke tbh belts dont mean anything anymore and we all know that.
We all know wlad was the man at heavyweight even when at that time you had chagaev, valuev, haye, povetkin, wilder all running round with a "belt" at some stage, nobody cared about it whatsoever.
We had no tyson fury and wilder didn't want to take any risks so #1 and #2 in the division faced off (klitschko joshua)
Thats all there is to it nobody cares about the bum ass belts these guys are carrying, you want to be the best stop trying to be donald trump, take reasonable money and go prove it.
Tired of tge yapping and no action on ALL sides, im starting to yearn for the days when klitschko used to shit guys like this up every few months.
Haha, this is true
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - Infern0 - 11-14-2017
(11-14-2017, 04:20 PM)diehard Wrote: So no belts given anymore?
Mate the belts mean pretty much nothing anymore its been that way for a long time.
Did marcos maidanas belt mean anything in his "unification" with floyd?
What belts were on the line in pac vs may? I cant remember.
I mean sure they are nice but all this posturing and "we deserve x because we have y belt" its nonsense.
Ring magazine belt used to matter but not anymore.
Its a money game at the end of the day, and how much $$$ you bring > any belts.
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - Infern0 - 11-14-2017
(11-14-2017, 04:29 PM)mippy Wrote: 40% is a good negotiating point, I'm sure they'll jump at 30. Wilder wants 50 and won't get it, so either they negotiate with one of the other champs or Joshua doesn't really want either fight.
I still think there's a very good chance of Joshua vs Parker in March.
Oh and Wilder won't fight White in March as an undercard to Wilder vs Joshua either.
They should jump at 30 itll be in excess of 10 million nzd, likely close to 15 and according to them AJ is just some stiff bum with a glass chin who parker will walk through and ko so go over there get your 10 mill and bladt the chinny robot out of there to become lineal champion
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - mippy - 11-14-2017
I want to believe!
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - diehard - 11-14-2017
But Infern0, are you suggesting that since the belts don't mean anything, that boxing should do away with all belts?
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - Infern0 - 11-14-2017
(11-14-2017, 05:45 PM)diehard Wrote: But Infern0, are you suggesting that since the belts don't mean anything, that boxing should do away with all belts?
Ian ideal world they would get rid of all the governing bodies and there would just be 1 belt in each division. But that will never happen.