As much as having 3-4 governing bodies is annoying it would prob be very boring with only 1. No bargaining -drama etc.
Would prefer only 3 max so dropping 1 belt
So you ARE for belts, but just one per division. Got it.
(11-14-2017, 04:52 PM)Infern0 Wrote: [ -> ]They should jump at 30 itll be in excess of 10 million nzd, likely close to 15 and according to them AJ is just some stiff bum with a glass chin who parker will walk through and ko so go over there get your 10 mill and bladt the chinny robot out of there to become lineal champion
Probably where it ends up and where Higgins is actually targeting. Its fairly basic negotiation.. higgins wouldn't ever be offered 30% if that was his starting point. He needed to respond to a 20% offer from Hearn with a 40% offer, along with some noise, to get to that 30% level. you don't show your best offer upfront. that would be counterproductive...
Yep 30 would be worthwhile Downunder broadcasting $$ will make a decent amount.
AJ will fill a stadium of 70-90,000 shadow boxing so a chance to unify will sell
(11-14-2017, 07:36 PM)diehard Wrote: [ -> ]So you ARE for belts, but just one per division. Got it.
Yes.
Used to be just two, WBC and WBA
Then the IBF came in and was made "prestigious" because its from America
then the WBO came in, was seen as a joke like how the IBO is now, but at some stage became seen as legit
How long is it until the IBO become recognized as a major belt, then wats next, the WBF?
I consider anyone who is not a lineal champion but has a belt as a "belt holder" NOT a "world champion"
looks like defence needs work