Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split?
(11-20-2017, 12:29 PM)diehard Wrote:
(11-20-2017, 10:19 AM)craigyid14 Wrote: Eddie Hearns a businessman and it would be bad business to give 35%, the WBO belt is not worth that. There'll be offered 20% at best, won't take it (because of greed) and will lose the belt before a fight with Joshua happens.

A friendly wager.  Parker will get in the 30+ percent.  AJ wants the belt.  He's got millions and millions, as does Hearn.  What's giving a few million more to your opponent.  Nobody's going hungry.  Mr Higgins has negotiated well.

I just don't see it, it goes against everything we know about Eddie Hearn,i dont care if Parker gets £1mill,£3.5mill or £10mill as long as the fight happens. It'll be the biggest fight in NZboxchat history, this forum would go crazy :-)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - craigyid14 - 11-20-2017, 08:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)