Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split?
(11-14-2017, 07:17 PM)Infern0 Wrote:
(11-14-2017, 05:45 PM)diehard Wrote: But Infern0, are you suggesting that since the belts don't mean anything, that boxing should do away with all belts?

Ian ideal world they would get rid of all the governing bodies and there would just be 1 belt in each division. But that will never happen.

(11-18-2017, 01:41 PM)Kiwi Wrote: Hearn would be mad to offer them any more than 29% after seeing this.

Then they won't fight. AJ needs Parker more than Parker needs him. There are no good fights than his fans want to see except Wilder. Parker has Bellew, Browne, and maybe Whyte and Miller.

If Mr Higgins had taken the 20%, we wouldn't be at 30+ right now. Good negotiating. Mr Higgins has a Plan B and C. Hearn is struggling for a Plan A, as Wilder won't take the short money either. Povetkin? He's looking at Joe, not AJ.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - diehard - 11-18-2017, 01:59 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)