01-23-2016, 01:57 PM
Stu says on his facebook page:
There was no rematch clause in the contract tendered to the IBF and Tyson was told he would have to make his mandatory IBF defense in his next fight should he win. Why carry on when you knew all along what the circumstances were. Fury winning was actually good for the division which has choked opportunity for a long time while Wladimir was on his winning streak. Now we will see more activity and more heavys getting their shot instead of having to wait 18 months once they became mandatory while Wladimir serviced his mandatory s. . With Wilder - Ortiz - Martin - Chagaev -Parker - Joshua - Takam - Fedesov in the mix now the division has livened up a bit at long last ...
There was no rematch clause in the contract tendered to the IBF and Tyson was told he would have to make his mandatory IBF defense in his next fight should he win. Why carry on when you knew all along what the circumstances were. Fury winning was actually good for the division which has choked opportunity for a long time while Wladimir was on his winning streak. Now we will see more activity and more heavys getting their shot instead of having to wait 18 months once they became mandatory while Wladimir serviced his mandatory s. . With Wilder - Ortiz - Martin - Chagaev -Parker - Joshua - Takam - Fedesov in the mix now the division has livened up a bit at long last ...