10-23-2016, 04:59 PM
You're way more insightful than me, Msreef. Questions: Why would Parker have to vacate his mandatory status in the IBF if he wins the WBO title? Or is it that he vacates the mandatory status with IBF title by just fighting Ruiz for the WBO?
Is the WBO saying that he HAS to fight his mandatory in 120 days regardless of who it is? Is that in keeping with the WBO rules, as it seems awful fast to defend your title against a mandatory so soon after winning it?
If Haye is in this for the money, he'd be foolish to fight Parker as opposed to AJ or Bellew. The WBA route is a mess, why would he go that route? And fight Klit or Ortiz?
Is the WBO saying that he HAS to fight his mandatory in 120 days regardless of who it is? Is that in keeping with the WBO rules, as it seems awful fast to defend your title against a mandatory so soon after winning it?
If Haye is in this for the money, he'd be foolish to fight Parker as opposed to AJ or Bellew. The WBA route is a mess, why would he go that route? And fight Klit or Ortiz?