NZBoxChat
Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - Printable Version

+- NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz)
+-- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? (/showthread.php?tid=431)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37


RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - bart - 11-14-2017

As much as having 3-4 governing bodies is annoying it would prob be very boring with only 1. No bargaining -drama etc.
Would prefer only 3 max so dropping 1 belt


RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - diehard - 11-14-2017

So you ARE for belts, but just one per division. Got it.


RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - cranky - 11-14-2017

(11-14-2017, 04:52 PM)Infern0 Wrote: They should jump at 30 itll be in excess of 10 million nzd, likely close to 15 and according to them AJ is just some stiff bum with a glass chin who parker will walk through and ko so go over there get your 10 mill and bladt the chinny robot out of there to become lineal champion

Probably where it ends up and where Higgins is actually targeting. Its fairly basic negotiation.. higgins wouldn't ever be offered 30% if that was his starting point. He needed to respond to a 20% offer from Hearn with a 40% offer, along with some noise, to get to that 30% level. you don't show your best offer upfront. that would be counterproductive...


RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - bart - 11-14-2017

Yep 30 would be worthwhile Downunder broadcasting $$ will make a decent amount.
AJ will fill a stadium of 70-90,000 shadow boxing so a chance to unify will sell


RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - Infern0 - 11-14-2017

(11-14-2017, 07:36 PM)diehard Wrote: So you ARE for belts, but just one per division.  Got it.

Yes.

Used to be just two, WBC and WBA

Then the IBF came in and was made "prestigious" because its from America

then the WBO came in, was seen as a joke like how the IBO is now, but at some stage became seen as legit

How long is it until the IBO become recognized as a major belt, then wats next, the WBF?

I consider anyone who is not a lineal champion but has a belt as a "belt holder" NOT a "world champion"


RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - diehard - 11-15-2017

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11944168


RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - NakiFan - 11-15-2017

https://twitter.com/joeboxerparker/status/930639483506122752


RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - bart - 11-15-2017

looks like defence needs work


RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - Infern0 - 11-16-2017

(11-15-2017, 06:00 PM)NakiFan Wrote: https://twitter.com/joeboxerparker/status/930639483506122752

Parker got 800 likes for that

Hearns response to stop spouting nonsense and pick up the phone got 2000 likes

Hearns KO Parker


RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - diehard - 11-16-2017

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-sports/98932365/tyson-fury-claims-joseph-parker-would-ko-anthony-joshua-as-unificatioin-fight-talks-resume