+- NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz)
+-- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? (/showthread.php?tid=431)
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - Infern0 - 11-18-2017
(11-18-2017, 12:22 PM)Kiwi Wrote: Parker's team need to be very patient here, or they're going to get played.
Go on a holiday, guys. Turn off the phone for a few weeks. Let Hearn be the one to sweat.
You are too anxious to make this happen.
Hearn wont be sweating mate and if mr higgins does that joshua vs david haye will be announced live in the ring in a couple of weeks after haye beats bellew
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - Infern0 - 11-18-2017
(11-18-2017, 01:59 PM)diehard Wrote:(11-14-2017, 07:17 PM)Infern0 Wrote:(11-14-2017, 05:45 PM)diehard Wrote: But Infern0, are you suggesting that since the belts don't mean anything, that boxing should do away with all belts?
Ian ideal world they would get rid of all the governing bodies and there would just be 1 belt in each division. But that will never happen.
(11-18-2017, 01:41 PM)Kiwi Wrote: Hearn would be mad to offer them any more than 29% after seeing this.
Then they won't fight. AJ needs Parker more than Parker needs him. There are no good fights than his fans want to see except Wilder. Parker has Bellew, Browne, and maybe Whyte and Miller.
If Mr Higgins had taken the 20%, we wouldn't be at 30+ right now. Good negotiating. Mr Higgins has a Plan B and C. Hearn is struggling for a Plan A, as Wilder won't take the short money either. Povetkin? He's looking at Joe, not AJ.
Haye vs bellew is in like 2 weeks.
Theres going to be a sold out arena full of people who just bought tickets to watch david haye fight.
Hearn will get in to the ring and say "who wants to see AJ vs Haye"
The entire arena full of haye fans will errupt.
Joshua vs haye will be announced for march 2018 at the cardiff stadium 85,000 closed roof ppv.
The entire point of haye bellew 1 was to set up AJ vs Haye, dont be too surprised if bellew has instructions to fall over in this rematch. Hearns aint about to get played by anyone
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - diehard - 11-18-2017
Just shows that the boxing mecca is in the UK. Yes, Haye/AJ would sell. Assuming Haye doesn't cancel the Bellew fight, and he wins. Also, Tyson Fury/AJ would sell. Assuming Tyson gets fit.
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - African Monkey - 11-18-2017
(11-18-2017, 03:34 PM)Infern0 Wrote:(11-18-2017, 01:59 PM)diehard Wrote:(11-14-2017, 07:17 PM)Infern0 Wrote:(11-14-2017, 05:45 PM)diehard Wrote: But Infern0, are you suggesting that since the belts don't mean anything, that boxing should do away with all belts?
Ian ideal world they would get rid of all the governing bodies and there would just be 1 belt in each division. But that will never happen.
(11-18-2017, 01:41 PM)Kiwi Wrote: Hearn would be mad to offer them any more than 29% after seeing this.
Then they won't fight. AJ needs Parker more than Parker needs him. There are no good fights than his fans want to see except Wilder. Parker has Bellew, Browne, and maybe Whyte and Miller.
If Mr Higgins had taken the 20%, we wouldn't be at 30+ right now. Good negotiating. Mr Higgins has a Plan B and C. Hearn is struggling for a Plan A, as Wilder won't take the short money either. Povetkin? He's looking at Joe, not AJ.
Haye vs bellew is in like 2 weeks.
Theres going to be a sold out arena full of people who just bought tickets to watch david haye fight.
Hearn will get in to the ring and say "who wants to see AJ vs Haye"
The entire arena full of haye fans will errupt.
Joshua vs haye will be announced for march 2018 at the cardiff stadium 85,000 closed roof ppv.
The entire point of haye bellew 1 was to set up AJ vs Haye, dont be too surprised if bellew has instructions to fall over in this rematch. Hearns aint about to get played by anyone
Would be a good fight if Haye's body could hold up, but tbh, I think we'll be lucky to see Haye in the ring again after this fight. He's far too injury prone and isn't getting any younger.
I'm more interested in seeing Haye's career as a promoter these days.
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - Nablonicasso - 11-19-2017
http://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-sports/99017807/Joseph-Parker-v-Anthony-Joshua-making-rapid-progress-with-fight-models-now-on-table?cid=app-android
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - diehard - 11-20-2017
What did I say? 33-35%!!!
https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-sports/99037757/joseph-parker-willing-to-take-35-per-cent-to-fight-anthony-joshua-and-were-nearly-there
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - craigyid14 - 11-20-2017
Eddie Hearns a businessman and it would be bad business to give 35%, the WBO belt is not worth that. There'll be offered 20% at best, won't take it (because of greed) and will lose the belt before a fight with Joshua happens.
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - mippy - 11-20-2017
if Parker gets 35% it'll be a great outcome.
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - diehard - 11-20-2017
(11-20-2017, 10:19 AM)craigyid14 Wrote: Eddie Hearns a businessman and it would be bad business to give 35%, the WBO belt is not worth that. There'll be offered 20% at best, won't take it (because of greed) and will lose the belt before a fight with Joshua happens.
A friendly wager. Parker will get in the 30+ percent. AJ wants the belt. He's got millions and millions, as does Hearn. What's giving a few million more to your opponent. Nobody's going hungry. Mr Higgins has negotiated well.
RE: Parker vs Joshua, Instead of What's a fair split? - bart - 11-20-2017
Why shouldn't \Higgins go hard?
If they really believe in JP get 30% and give AJ a rematch clause.
The only greed is from Eddie at this stage trying to play hard ball much like the Klit bros did when they ruled. Take them on I say