NZBoxChat
Parker vs Ruiz for WBO - Printable Version

+- NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz)
+-- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Parker vs Ruiz for WBO (/showthread.php?tid=185)



RE: Parker vs Ruiz for WBO - NakiFan - 11-19-2016

There should be 4 weight divisions.

Heavy
Middle
Light
Weedy


RE: Parker vs Ruiz for WBO - Justapakeha - 11-19-2016

Buttabean on the Ruiz Parker card. Pathetic....


RE: Parker vs Ruiz for WBO - craigyid14 - 11-19-2016

(11-19-2016, 12:46 PM)NakiFan Wrote: There should be 4 weight divisions.

Heavy
Middle
Light
Weedy

What a stupid post.


RE: Parker vs Ruiz for WBO - NakiFan - 11-19-2016

(11-19-2016, 01:17 PM)craigyid14 Wrote:
(11-19-2016, 12:46 PM)NakiFan Wrote: There should be 4 weight divisions.

Heavy
Middle
Light
Weedy

What a stupid post.

Yes and no. 
  • minimumweight, 105 pounds (48 kg)
  • light flyweight, 108 pounds (49 kg)
  • flyweight, 112 pounds (51 kg)
  • super flyweight, 115 pounds (52 kg)
  • bantamweight, 118 pounds (53.5 kg)
  • super bantamweight, 122 pounds (55 kg)
  • featherweight, 126 pounds (57 kg)
  • super featherweight, 130 pounds (59 kg)
  • lightweight, 135 pounds (61 kg)
  • super lightweight, 140 pounds (63.5 kg)
  • welterweight, 147 pounds (67 kg)
  • super welterweight, 154 pounds (70 kg)
  • middleweight, 160 pounds (72.5 kg)
  • super middleweight, 168 pounds (76 kg)
  • light heavyweight, 175 pounds (79 kg)
  • cruiserweight, 200 pounds (91 kg)
  • heavyweight, unlimited

TOO many divisions! I'd rather see the Olympic divisions implemented into pro boxing...but I suppose more divisions more sanctioning fees.


RE: Parker vs Ruiz for WBO - craigyid14 - 11-19-2016

It was a troll like post, referring to any boxer below 135lb as weedy. Just because you prefer to watch fellas with breasts cuddle for 12 rounds (isn't that similar to gay porn?) doesn't mean the lighter divisions are 'weedy'. Are you a Fatboy in a thin mans body? Of coarse there's too many weight divisions and too many champions but you can't have it both ways, I mean your hero Joseph Parker in all likelihood wouldn't become 'world champion' if there wasn't more than 1 sanctioning body......


RE: Parker vs Ruiz for WBO - diehard - 11-19-2016

I prefer more the old way of doing things.  Adding cruiser, but that's it.  So it would be:

Heavyweight
Cruiser
Light Heavyweight
Middleweight
Welterweight
Lightweight
Flyweight
Bantamweight
Featherweight

And that's it.  I'm ok with the different alphabets if they fought each other.  Often.  But they don't.


RE: Parker vs Ruiz for WBO - craigyid14 - 11-19-2016

I'd have the old 8 (adding feather to your list), but agree with keeping cruiser. With modern boxers its too much to expect someone of 180-190lbs to beat a guys built naturally (or unnaturally) bigger these days.


RE: Parker vs Ruiz for WBO - NakiFan - 11-19-2016

(11-19-2016, 02:41 PM)craigyid14 Wrote: It was a troll like post, referring to any boxer below 135lb as weedy. Just because you prefer to watch fellas with breasts cuddle for 12 rounds (isn't that similar to gay porn?)  doesn't mean the lighter divisions are 'weedy'. Are you a Fatboy in a thin mans body? Of coarse there's too many weight divisions and too many champions but you can't have it both ways, I mean your hero Joseph Parker in all likelihood wouldn't become 'world champion' if there wasn't more than 1 sanctioning body......

I'm 6ft 4 and 106kg. So I refer to those nearly half my weight as weedy. That's just me. I could call them bantams or flys or strawpeople....? 


RE: Parker vs Ruiz for WBO - diehard - 11-19-2016

(11-19-2016, 03:02 PM)diehard Wrote: I prefer more the old way of doing things.  Adding cruiser, but that's it.  So it would be:

Heavyweight
Cruiser
Light Heavyweight
Middleweight
Welterweight
Lightweight
Flyweight
Bantamweight
Featherweight

And that's it.  I'm ok with the different alphabets if they fought each other.  Often.  But they don't.

(11-19-2016, 03:10 PM)craigyid14 Wrote: I'd have the old 8 (adding feather to your list), but agree with keeping cruiser. With modern boxers its too much to expect someone of 180-190lbs to beat a guys built naturally (or unnaturally) bigger these days.

Yep, added Featherweight. Was doing it from memory and forgot Featherweight.


RE: Parker vs Ruiz for WBO - diehard - 11-19-2016

(11-19-2016, 01:02 PM)Justapakeha Wrote: Buttabean on the Ruiz Parker card. Pathetic....

Where did you see this? Post it please. I can't find the undercard anywhere. Will keep looking. We're only 3 weeks out.